Jump to content

Photo

Help STL


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1
PKeane

PKeane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Cocoa Beach, FL
  • Region:Southeast
I would like to request the help of the SM community. We have created a new Regional class called STL. The STL class rules are loosely based on the ITA rules, but remove some of the tech inspector problems in IT. The ST committee would like to encourage any SM competitors that are double dipping on regional weekends to run STL as their second class.

I believe that STL will be a good fit for all Miata’s and MX5’s that want to prepare their cars beyond SM and SM5. As the chairman of the ST committee, I can assure you that we will do everything possible to make Miata’s and MX5 competitive in STL.

The STO and STU classes have proven to be very popular in National racing. I believe STL will be as popular once it reaches National status. Thank you, PK.

#2
Jim Daniels - FIG

Jim Daniels - FIG

    Site Founder

  • Administrators
  • 274 posts
  • Location:Germantown TN
  • Region:Mid-South
  • Car Year:1989
  • Car Number:Any
I almost forgot about this class!!

Yet another place to race a MX5.

Hoover, chime in??

"Never Stop Challenging"



Jim Daniels

Auto Sports Consulting / Coaching

My cup runneth over - Playboy Mazda MX-5 Cup Champ Beta-Tester - Assisted us with beta testing the website. Sponsor / Advertiser - Site sponsor / advertiser... support these guys! Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! ARRC Champion - Won the ARRC Race in a Spec Miata Series Champ - Won a points based series in a Spec Miata Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other BFG Supertour Winner - Majors Winner - World Challenge Participant in a Mazda  - World Challenge Participant in a Mazda Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill - Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill June Sprints winner  - June Sprints winner Grand-Am Competitor - Grand-Am Competitor in a Mazda  (can be GT, and ST)

#3
Edens

Edens

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Location:Sherwood, AR
  • Region:Midiv
  • Car Year:1990
  • Car Number:26
I know someone who is building a STL Miata. Looks like a fun car.

#4
William Bonsell

William Bonsell

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 398 posts
  • Location:Poulsbo, WA
  • Region:Northwest
  • Car Year:1999
So I guess I am a bit confused about the STL vs ITA issue with regards to a Spec Miata. A true 1.6 SM has not been very competitive in a huge ITA field and there were some tech issues I believe. That being said, it appears from what I have been reading, that the STL class allows significant upgrades over the standard SM built. Why then this new class? I was hoping the new STL class would essentially allow a full on SM to be more competitive in a 2nd class. Perhaps I am reading this all wrong. I would certainly not like to put my 1.6 into STL and be further off the pace than I can be in a huge ITA class.

What's everyone's take on this.....Thanks.

Bill
Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#5
Bruce Wilson

Bruce Wilson

    Gold Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • Region:Oregon
  • Car Year:1991
  • Car Number:68
Bill,

There was a lot of conversation over the winter about the SM potential rule changes and if that would be legal in ITA. The discussion made a lot of folks realize/understand/recognize that the ITA rules some regions had in supps weren't defensible. That is why, at least the Oregon region, we decided to use STL as the legal double dip class for SM. You are correct that a SM trim car will be at a worse advantage in STL, but I wouldn't worry too much about that until folks start building competitive cars in the class. Either way, a true ITA or STL Miata would stomp a SM so it was a crap shoot either way, BUT at least now the supps are in line with the rules.

-bw

I have an opinion so I must be right

Series Champ - Won a points based series in a Spec Miata Survivalist - Won 25 Hours at Thunderhill! We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#6
William Bonsell

William Bonsell

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 398 posts
  • Location:Poulsbo, WA
  • Region:Northwest
  • Car Year:1999
Thanks Bruce....

I have also posted over on ICSCC to see it they intend to add the STL class to their Group 5 and move all the SM's that run ITA into STL. I don't think SCCA NWR is up to speed on this either. Enjoy your first race weekend. Sunday looks very wet....Hope to see you at Rose Cup.

Bill
Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#7
Bruce Wilson

Bruce Wilson

    Gold Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • Region:Oregon
  • Car Year:1991
  • Car Number:68
Bill,

We did include NW Region in our discussion on this change. We like to at least be the same as NWR and SFR if at all possible.

-bw

I have an opinion so I must be right

Series Champ - Won a points based series in a Spec Miata Survivalist - Won 25 Hours at Thunderhill! We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#8
Johnny D

Johnny D

    Veteran Member

  • Moderators
  • 6,121 posts
  • Location:Fremont, CA
  • Region:San Francisco
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:88
I posted this yesterday in our (SFR) Sup. Reg.

We also have STL in group 5.
STL - a region only class added by SCCA National for Spec Miatas will be included in SFR Group 5. STL creates a Super Touring class for cars with engines 2.0L and below (with STL-specific restrictions; see GCR 9.1.4.3). Miatas in STL must be fully SMT compliant (including tires).

I spoke with Tam and Sherry.
Currently STL is a alternate to ITA/S.
Run which ever.
J~


Here's the ITA rules...
SMT/SSM in ITA: 1990-1997 SMT or SSM class-compliant cars may enter ITA. SMT or SSM cars entering as ITA cars must comply with all SMT/SSM Class rules except for tires, which must comply with GCR Section 9.3.45 (Tires). All other ITA entries must comply fully with ITA class rules per GCR Section 9.1.3.
1999-2005 SMT class-compliant cars may enter ITS. SMT cars entering as ITS cars must comply with all SMT class rules except for tires, which must comply with GCR Section 9.3.45 (Tires); and restrictor plates, which must comply with GCR Section 9.1.3. All other ITS entries must comply fully with ITS class rules per GCR Section 9.1.3.

I was told that the RP comment for ITS would be motioned to be removed.

As I see it.
ITA/S you can run different tires that ITA/S permits. (a real ITA/S car will kick you butt)
STL is SM compliant.

J~
2011 NASA Western Endurance Racing Championship E3 Champ
We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Beta-Tester - Assisted us with beta testing the website. Donor - Made PayPal donation Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Novel Approach - When a paragraph simply won't do... Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill - Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+

#9
William Bonsell

William Bonsell

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 398 posts
  • Location:Poulsbo, WA
  • Region:Northwest
  • Car Year:1999

Bill,

There was a lot of conversation over the winter about the SM potential rule changes and if that would be legal in ITA. The discussion made a lot of folks realize/understand/recognize that the ITA rules some regions had in supps weren't defensible. That is why, at least the Oregon region, we decided to use STL as the legal double dip class for SM. You are correct that a SM trim car will be at a worse advantage in STL, but I wouldn't worry too much about that until folks start building competitive cars in the class. Either way, a true ITA or STL Miata would stomp a SM so it was a crap shoot either way, BUT at least now the supps are in line with the rules.

-bw


Bruce....

So is it your understanding that a fully compliant SM is no longer legal in ITA and must run in STL as the 2nd class, or is this just something specific to SFR, Oregon and NWR? I have looked at the 2011 GCR's and things seem a bit confusing. And the intent of national establishing this STL regional class, wasn't for the purpose of allowing those drivers to enter STU at Nationals as has been suggested over on another forum. Thanks.

Bill
Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#10
Jim Creighton

Jim Creighton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 430 posts
  • Location:Atlanta
  • Region:Atlanta
  • Car Number:53
Peter, perhaps it might be helpful to be specific about some of the ITA rule violations if a driver double dips his SM. The other question I have is about the new SM 5 class for MX 5 cars. At what point should a MX 5 run SM 5 vs running STL? Is this the SM cars running ITS?

It's going to take a lot of cross over to bring the entry level up high enough to have these classes become National classes so I think a little education might be helpful. I, for one, tried to read the new STL rules and at about the 5th page I found myself thinking about a beach in Hawaii!

#11
Mike Collins

Mike Collins

    Big Cheese

  • Moderators
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Summit Point Motorsports Park
  • Region:Washington DC
  • Car Number:75
I am with Jim. I read the book and I still need the readers digest version.
Mike "MEATHEAD" Collins
Founder - Partner
MEATHEADRacing
240-476-1593

www.meatheadracing.com
Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Sponsor / Advertiser - Site sponsor / advertiser... support these guys! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Sugar Daddy - Made PayPal donation of $500+ Donor - Made PayPal donation Beta-Tester - Assisted us with beta testing the website. MX5 Cup Participant - Has Participated in a MX5Cup.com Series Event Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other

#12
PKeane

PKeane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Cocoa Beach, FL
  • Region:Southeast
Sorry guys it took me so long to see this thread. First of all the STL rules set was created because IT was never going to reach National status. The IT rule set is very popular, but one of the biggest draw backs was the ability to assure tech compliance. One of the main goals was to make STL easier to tech than an IT car (maximum valve lift and compression). A second goal was to try to equal the HP potential of all the manufactures engines. In most basic terms, we found that Honda’s made more HP than other manufactures, because they had more valve lift.

There are several IT rules that make SM cars noncompliant. The easy ones that come to mind are changing the front spindles or converting your 90-93 to a torsen rear. I know there are more, but that is what popped in my head.

Jim, we recently adopted the SM5 rule right into STL. You can now run your SM5 in STL and be compliant. I know my friend Mr. Collins won’t like this, but I think STL has a lot better chance of making National status then SM5. All of the current SM cars are STL legal.

The committee is currently working on simplifying how the rules read. Thanks for the discussion, PK

#13
Mike Collins

Mike Collins

    Big Cheese

  • Moderators
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Summit Point Motorsports Park
  • Region:Washington DC
  • Car Number:75

Jim, we recently adopted the SM5 rule right into STL. You can now run your SM5 in STL and be compliant. I know my friend Mr. Collins won’t like this, but I think STL has a lot better chance of making National status then SM5.


I love it. So I race an SM5 in STL at a National and in SM5 at a regional and when the SM5 numbers get high enough it can have its own national class????
Mike "MEATHEAD" Collins
Founder - Partner
MEATHEADRacing
240-476-1593

www.meatheadracing.com
Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Sponsor / Advertiser - Site sponsor / advertiser... support these guys! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Sugar Daddy - Made PayPal donation of $500+ Donor - Made PayPal donation Beta-Tester - Assisted us with beta testing the website. MX5 Cup Participant - Has Participated in a MX5Cup.com Series Event Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other

#14
Steve S.

Steve S.

    Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Location:Roanoke, VA
  • Region:Blue Ridge
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:85
And one more clarification: a '99 SM does or does not have to run the RP in STL?

thks

#15
PKeane

PKeane

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Cocoa Beach, FL
  • Region:Southeast
The 99 does not have to run the plate in STL.

That is correct Mr Collins. PK

#16
Keith Novak

Keith Novak

    Steadily Improving Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,128 posts
  • Location:Seattle
  • Region:Northwest/Oregon
  • Car Year:1995
  • Car Number:88
Check your regional supps on that. I believe ours here say we must run in full SM trim if we're going to double dip SM and STL.
Donor - Made PayPal donation Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations!

#17
Steve S.

Steve S.

    Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Location:Roanoke, VA
  • Region:Blue Ridge
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:85
10-4, thanks.

#18
Mike Colangelo

Mike Colangelo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 87 posts
  • Region:Cal Club (SoCal)

The 99 does not have to run the plate in STL.


Pete, are you sure about that?

According to Rule 9.1.4.b in the 2011 GCR:

"Spec Miata cars completely conforming to Spec Miata class specifications are eligible for STL."

Has something changed?

#19
Tyler Raatz

Tyler Raatz

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 17 posts

Pete, are you sure about that?

According to Rule 9.1.4.b in the 2011 GCR:

"Spec Miata cars completely conforming to Spec Miata class specifications are eligible for STL."

Has something changed?


Pull the plate, you now have a legal ITS car. Enter STL as an ITS car, you wont need to meet STL specific saftey equipment rules on spec miata R/P rules.

#20
Johnny D

Johnny D

    Veteran Member

  • Moderators
  • 6,121 posts
  • Location:Fremont, CA
  • Region:San Francisco
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:88

Pete, are you sure about that?

According to Rule 9.1.4.b in the 2011 GCR:

"Spec Miata cars completely conforming to Spec Miata class specifications are eligible for STL."

Has something changed?


I think you both are right, IMO.
99 (not SM) no plate.
99SM required.
J~
2011 NASA Western Endurance Racing Championship E3 Champ
We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Beta-Tester - Assisted us with beta testing the website. Donor - Made PayPal donation Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Novel Approach - When a paragraph simply won't do... Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill - Survive the 25, NASA Thunderhill Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users