Everyone,
This is mostly for the California crowd, but maybe others have been through it as well.
Also for the "street-legal, I kept a plate on it crowd". I find it very useful to be able to drive the car to the dyno when I want, or drive it to work a few times during the week before racing just to practice shifting.
Last time I has to pass smog check in CA to get my lic. plate sticker, I was at the edge of NOx and COx emissions.
Since then, I bought a new head, checked compression which is over 185 on all 4, bought the 5X Racing adjustable FPR from Weekend-Racer, and tuned on the dyno to get my AFR to just about 12:1. Starts at 15:1, ends at 12.16:1, pretty linear decrease from 3500 to 6700 RPM.
Every time I go to the emissions dyno, I swap out the open SD exhaust for the stock cat and muffler set up. For those elsewhere, in California, they put you on a dyno and run up to 3000 RPM at full and part throttle to test emissions.
SOOOooooo, who wants to venture a guess whether I've made my emissions better or worse? From chemistry, I think that running hte engine leaner will produce better flame front progression, more complete mixture consumption, and fewer COx by products. BUT, higher EGTs mean more chances for NOx waste, which isn't as well catalizied by the cat.
As always, I love to over think it. And I will post results after my smog test. But with the restrictor plate, AFR tuned to the plate, more or less smae ambient conditions as the dyno day, and the complete list of stock emissions control bits, has the AFR made my greenhouse impact better or worse, in the eyes of Big Brother Bear? (That neutered animal on the Calif. Flag....)
Thanks for your thoughts,
Wilson