Jump to content

Photo

CCC report from Homestead

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
FTodaro

FTodaro

    Veteran Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,084 posts
  • Location:Columbus Ohio
  • Region:Great Lakes
  • Car Year:2001
  • Car Number:35

I am sure most of you have seen the memorandum below from Erick Prill on the  CCC report from Homestead. I like the idea of reporting to the class on the details, but i am sure that is the point to keep everyone advised of what is to come.

 

I have highlighted the only information in this memo that gives me concern. I understand the need in our class for this approach and the use of an CCC. I understand the need for prompt decisions.

 

I am not saying its a bad idea, i am saying i am not sure.

 

From a due process perspective i am concerned about giving anyone absolute power with no right of appeal. But we will just have to wait and see how this process works and how it is enforced.

 

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO: SCCA Spec Miata Participants

FROM: Eric Prill, SCCA Chief Operations Officer

RE: Homestead 2015 Compliance Program

DATE: January 14, 2015

 

As you all are aware, it's been a somewhat tumultuous time lately in the Spec Miata community. SCCA has worked along with leadership from Mazda and NASA since the Runoffs to ensure a healthy future for the Spec Miata class. We have received considerable input throughout this process, and this has led to some new regulations and a renewed focus on ensuring everyone competing is compliant.

 

As such, the group has established a new travelling compliance program. SCCA's Board of Directors has supported this initiative by creating the new Class Compliance Chief (CCC) position, a motorsports professional subject matter expert for the class, who can make non-protestable compliance rulings. SCCA will utilize this at select races this year, and I would like to make sure that we report back to the community after each trip.

 

At the January 9-11, 2015 U.S. Majors Tour event at Homestead Miami Speedway, SCCA Club Racing Technical Manager John Bauer was designated the CCC for Spec Miata. The CCC led the inspection process for the Spec Miata class throughout the event, determining what items were to be checked, and ruling on any compliance issues.

 

The event format was a three-day doubleheader Majors event, with 43 drivers participating. The following items were determined prior to the event to be checked for compliance in addition to the typical items a Region would check, with the ability to look at other items if circumstances determined it necessary.

 

Qualifying (impound all): restrictor plate (visual), random driveshaft material check

Race 1 (Positions 1-3, 14): restrictor plate (measurement), compression ratio (Whistler), cylinder heads sealed for inspection following race two, wheel weight and battery weight.

Race 2 (Saturday Positions 1-3, 14; Sunday Positions 1-3, 8): restrictor plate (measurement), compression ratio (Whistler), intake short turn radius, intake/exhaust throat, intake/exhaust unshrouding and valve seats.

 

Findings:

 

Qualifying: All items inspected were found in compliance with the exception of:

- One car was found to have a different restrictor plate. This was dimensionally correct, but not anodized and stamped by SCCA Enterprises. The piece was determined to be pre-production version of the current required plate. The piece was confiscated, but no penalty was assessed.

 

Race 1: All items inspected were found in compliance. Heads were sealed for removal on Sunday.

 

Race 2: All items inspected were found in compliance with the exception of:

-#56 Buras: Intake valve short turn radii de-burred beyond the maximum allowed specification (1.5mm).

-#39 Steyn: Valve unshrouding beyond the maximum allowed specification on one of eight intake valves.

-#28 Saunders: Refused to remove cylinder head.

 

Methodology:

-For short turn radius de-burring, SCCA has developed a gauge machined out of stainless steel, similar in size to a popsicle stick, with a 1.5 mm groove machined into it. The gauge is used with a dental mirror to check for compliance within 1.5 mm. SCCA also has 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm gauges. A drawing is available here.

-For measuring valve unshrouding, SCCA Enterprises produced and sells a set of gauges that fits within a valve guide and turns around the valve shroud on the mating surface of the head. If the gauge drops between the mating surface and valve seat, the casting has been unshrouded beyond the maximum specification.

 

Penalties:

The findings of the CCC were presented to the U.S. Majors Tour Southeastern Conference Series Chief Steward, who assessed penalties per the SCCA Steward penalty guidelines. The cars found non-compliant were moved behind the last finishing car (and would have had any points earned removed) in both races. The car refusing a teardown was disqualified from the event.

 

Other Observations:

While not specifically focused on or measured, tech staff observed a variance in body panel gaps across the cars at Homestead. The SCCA Technical Staff wants to remind drivers that the service manual gaps specify a 3.5mm-6.5mm gap where the hood meets the bumper and a 4.0mm-6.0mm gap between the hood and front fenders.

 

Summary:

 

This program has been developed to ensure a level playing field in the Spec Miata class through compliance checks. The ruling of compliance vs. non-compliance is based on the written regulations and not a subjective analysis of the benefit of any modification. Also, nowhere will we use the word "cheat," or any derivative thereof, because that would imply intent, and these rulings do not consider intent, only compliance. At each race weekend throughout the season, local scrutineer teams will continue their technical inspections, with the CCC attending select events.

 

Finally, the goal of the CCC and the compliance program is not to bust people for being out of compliance. Nobody likes penalties—we're all doing this for fun! But compliance is critical to ensure a fair and level playing field. We would like nothing more than to have our inspectors report 100 percent compliance at events. But this requires a commitment by everyone in the community to ensure that their cars meet the regulations bumper-to-bumper, top-to-bottom, inside and out. These checks throughout the season will not only help to achieve compliance at each event, but also ensure a smooth and drama-free Runoffs this September.

 

See you at the track!

 

 

 

 
 

  • MarekM likes this

Frank
TnT Racing
SCCA Ohio Valley Region
 

Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver Donor - Made PayPal donation

#2
Brandon

Brandon

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 765 posts
  • Location:North Jersey
  • Region:NNJR
  • Car Year:1996
  • Car Number:48SM

Frank,

I'd call this a good step forward on ensuring Majors tech is in-line with what we (as a community) would want to see done.

Unfortunately tech folks, with the multitude of classes, cannot have all technical expertise for all classes at-hand so we've agreed to abide by the technical interpretations of this CCC person.

 

I think the terms associated with their determinations (non-protestable) need a revision or clarification in that the determination of whatever ruling is still based upon the Chief of Tech to decide to penalize or not by using the CCC's determination of their checks.

How I see it, you have hands use the tools/gauges (local tech) plus the observations of an expert during the use of tools/gauges (CCC; who is the expert on how to use them) who then submit to the Chief of Tech what was found and they make a decision/ruling.  

 

I don't think the intent was to change the post-race inspection process to permit the CCC to institute penalties but merely to provide the expert knowledge of the class as a whole (specs, measurements, how to use tools...) to assist the stewards in making the decisions.

 

That make sense?

B


Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#3
zoomzoom22

zoomzoom22

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Region:Southeast

Is there one of these reports from the Cal Club and Sebring races?



#4
Peter Olivola

Peter Olivola

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 180 posts

Just to be accurate with how the process works, no tech inspector or CCC determines penalties.  Their job is to make observations, measurements and render an opinion (binding in the case of the CCC) on compliance.  It is still up to the stewards to determine what, if any, penalty is to be assessed and that penalty (or lack of penalty) remains subject to the protest/appeal process.

 

Frank,

I'd call this a good step forward on ensuring Majors tech is in-line with what we (as a community) would want to see done.

Unfortunately tech folks, with the multitude of classes, cannot have all technical expertise for all classes at-hand so we've agreed to abide by the technical interpretations of this CCC person.

 

I think the terms associated with their determinations (non-protestable) need a revision or clarification in that the determination of whatever ruling is still based upon the Chief of Tech to decide to penalize or not by using the CCC's determination of their checks.

How I see it, you have hands use the tools/gauges (local tech) plus the observations of an expert during the use of tools/gauges (CCC; who is the expert on how to use them) who then submit to the Chief of Tech what was found and they make a decision/ruling.  

 

I don't think the intent was to change the post-race inspection process to permit the CCC to institute penalties but merely to provide the expert knowledge of the class as a whole (specs, measurements, how to use tools...) to assist the stewards in making the decisions.

 

That make sense?

B



#5
Terry Hanushek

Terry Hanushek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 256 posts
  • Location:New Jersey
  • Region:South Jersey

Zoom

 

Is there one of these reports from the Cal Club and Sebring races?

 

No - There was no CCC appointed for either race

 

Terry






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users