40 replies to this topic

[Ron Alan]

more misleading BS...
I am sure you looked at both cars as you are always poking around.. You really think the only difference there was 99 vs 90. If so we really have little else to talk about.

Implying the 1.6 had 0 chance is just not accurate. the drivers in those 1.6 cars against that competition stood zero chance. you can stretch that to say none of the 99 stood a chance with Carbonell and Drennan both in VVt cars. More BS! The best driver in won in a good car, not the best car but a good one. if drennan was in a 1.6 prepped by any good shop.. your statement holds no credibility whatsoever.Yeah yeah, I know bla bla tested a 1.6 before hand.

I know your feelings on my opinion...got it.
 
At least i'm good with the fact I'm not the only one who doesnt feel the 1.6 is a good weapon at Laguna. Equal driver, equal prep cars...I know where I put my money. 
 
Ironically, I wasnt thinking about parity at all...only one person can win at Daytona, so I think the rest should bring whatever they got and have a good time...they can use there headlight flips to wave at the crowd!