Or not. If someone on a board posts an editorial saying something odd then can't handle easy questions about what they just posted, I'm going to call them out on it.
I asked a simple question, Sean elected to go personal.
R "1.8 temperamental? Who told you that?"
S Maybe i got confused with the driver of the 1.8's....."
But leaving Sean's issues aside, does anyone else feel that the 1.8 is difficult to keep tuned?
I have no problem handling your easy question. What I have a problem with was your attitude and delivery which is why I didn't answer it.
I also have never said the 1.8L was difficult to keep tuned. Your putting words in my mouth now.
So.... Let me be crystal clear here for you..... On top of the volunteering my time for this class and running 3 small companies, I try to be thorough and cordial in my thoughts when posting about the class. The conversation about NA/NB differences and why people are not building more NA's comes up often. Part of that discussion is about the "easy button" and that it is easier and cheaper to build an NB to the Nth degree. When it comes to the 1.6L NA versus the NB the NA car is more temperamental and harder to keep running at the ragged edge. So, I rarely ever have a NA 1.8L specific discussion and was just responding as I normally due about the basic NA/NB differences. I shouldn't have put that one part of a much larger thought on the generic differences in the cars into my response.
You can choose in life to be part of the problem or part of the solution. I am choosing to be part of the solution. It appear to me and others that your pot stirring posts and attitude about SCCA in general are not part of the solution. Take that for what it's worth, I know I am not the first guy to say it to you.
So.... Again, you win the internet tough guy award. I'm done dealing with you.