Jump to content

Photo

Did Anyone Also Consider Spec Racer Ford?

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#21
DavidNJ

DavidNJ

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Location:New Jersey

I seriously considered it for my son and for me. But there was no way I would participate in their motor program. The SM program is way better.Couldyuou

 

Could you elaborate on that?

 

Most of the comments I've seen have been in the other direction, that a lot of time and money goes into extracting the last hp or 2 in SM while SRF comes sealed from the factory with the ECU tweaked to make them equal.



#22
Jamz14

Jamz14

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,086 posts
  • Location:California

Could you elaborate on that?

 

Most of the comments I've seen have been in the other direction, that a lot of time and money goes into extracting the last hp or 2 in SM while SRF comes sealed from the factory with the ECU tweaked to make them equal.

Sealed engine programs are expensive, do not guarantee equal performance from the sealed units and are an invitation for cheating. Less money and way more certainty come from a non sealed program that is open for inspection at any time and does not require you to send your motor back to the sealing company to be resealed. Furthermore, 1 or 2 HP difference is not the difference between winning and losing. The difference in winning and losing when cars are within 4-5 hp of each other is how that HP is put to the ground through the running gear.

 

My strategy is to invest in a solid motor and spend the rest of the time making the car roll free and loose to take advantage of the moderate power. I take my cue from a class of racing where it is absolutely certain that every entry makes exactly the same power, and you see the difference in winning and losing by how much time was spent improving the rolling resistance........soap box racing


  • Mike Colangelo and luvin_the_rings like this
Broken record - You are starting to sound like a broken record. Donor - Made PayPal donation Sponsor / Advertiser - Site sponsor / advertiser... support these guys! Novel Approach - When a paragraph simply won't do... Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#23
Danny Steyn

Danny Steyn

    Zulu rain warrior

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,167 posts
  • Location:Fort Lauderdale
  • Region:FL
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:39

TWELVE inches to the left and it would be good bye. Watch to the end.

 

There is something to be said for the full cage, just sayin

 


  • Nick Soriano, Danica Davison and Preston Pardus like this

Danny
Danny Steyn Racing | DSR YouTube Channel
Danny Steyn Photography | Adept Studios | OPM AutosportsRossini Racing Engines | G-Loc | Traqmate | Traqgear

2016 June Sprints WInner, ARRC Winner, NASA Eastern States Championships Podium

2015 Eastern Conference Majors Champ, June Sprints Winner, ARRC Winner

2014 NASA Eastern States Championship Runner Up.

2013 SEDiv Driver of the Year, Eastern Conference Majors Champ, SEDiv National Champ, ARRC Winner, Runoffs Podium

2011 SEDiv Driver of the Year, SEDiv National Champ, ARRC Winner, Palm Tree Quad National Champ, SEDiv ECR Champ
2010 June Sprints Winner, ARRC Winner

2009 SARRC Champ, SEDiv ECR Champ, FES Champ
2008 SEDiv ECR Champ

June Sprints winner  - June Sprints winner Series Champ - Won a points based series in a Spec Miata ARRC Champion - Won the ARRC Race in a Spec Miata We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver June Sprints winner  - June Sprints winner ARRC Champion - Won the ARRC Race in a Spec Miata ARRC Champion - Won the ARRC Race in a Spec Miata Majors Winner - BFG Supertour Winner -

#24
callumhay

callumhay

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 70 posts
  • Location:tampa
  • Region:fl
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:35
Wow!
Pictures tell a thousand words...
  • Danny Steyn likes this

#25
DavidNJ

DavidNJ

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Location:New Jersey

Why were they on the track at the same time? The nose of the SM would easily use the nose of the SRF as a ramp. Note that the SRF was hit by a Miata that didn't see it. There are other videos on the web where production cars on the track with SRFs don't see and crash into the SRFs. The SRF is always the loser. 

 

There was a big debate about this in SRF world a few years ago. In the period where SRF3 was coming soon they seem to feel interest in SRF wained a bit causing them to be grouped with production cars more frequently. It appears that has largely passed. 

But wrecks occur in both classes...which is what drove me into oval track racing where a super late model is less than an SM or SRF, is purpose-built tube frame chassis with great parts at reasonable prices, built like a tank, and in spite of 500hp, less than 3000 lb, 10" wide wheels with 13" wide tires hit maybe 105-110 mph on a 1/3rd mile oval. And I already have the car. The track closed, then reopened...and we are talking about one track.

 

post-5925-0-25916200-1487396830.jpg
 

Attached Files



#26
Wolfgang

Wolfgang

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Location:Maryland
My son, with significant national-level karting experience, and I, a rookie, drove an SRF2 for three years, which I then converted to SRF3 and we drove that for a year. I sold that to get into Showroom Spec Miata, which in the D.C./North Virginia area is now bigger than SM. Going from a kart to the SRF was much more interesting--tight suspension, purpose-built, open cockpit--than a production car. The SRF3 is an awesome car, but it's not in my budget range anymore. What was billed as a $10K DIY engine conversion was more like $15K, with SCCA nickel & diming subsequently necessary add-ons. SCCA is a parts monopoly for SRF: you have to go through your local service rep. for all parts, and even for a head rebuild the whole engine is shipped to Colorado to be fixed, dyno'd, and sealed, like $4K! Transaxles are sealed and a rebuild every 3-4 seasons by a certified tech runs $2500. Ad nauseum. Sorry for the rant! The SMM is forgiving, there's always someone to race, parts are readily available, etc.
  • Jim Drago, Danny Steyn, Justin Casey and 1 other like this

#27
scott sanda

scott sanda

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 38 posts

It is a tough choice. I had the choice of putting my son in one of Dave's rentals, or in a rental SRF gen 2 this year.  SM rental was cheaper, but I already paddock with an SRF, so I ended up buying a Gen 2, with the intent of also running it at Majors and bringing 2 cars to Indy.

 

I think of you Pro/Con the two, it all comes down to preference and feel. Locally here, both groups have big participation, and lots of people willing and able to mentor a beginner.  Closed cockpit is a plus for SM, but really simple crash repair is a plus for SRF.

 

SRF 2 and 3 will literally run 17 heat cycles on a set of tires without any drop off, which I don't think is the case with SM. SRF has more car to car parity than SM since it is so highly controlled, but at the pointy end of SM there is a lot of car to car parity as well just through evolution. Sm is not really "spec" since it is not all single sourced and all the motrs are not turned and adjusted on the same dyno then sealed, but it is very, very close, and does allow a certain amount of tinkering not allowed in SRF.  You can get DQ'd in SRF for the wrong oil filter.....

 

The Gen 3 conversion is 17K. I paid 13K for the Gen 2 I just bought, and it already had pretty much every available upgrade, so I'll be at 30K plus realistically 10 for "stuff", so the number comes in at $40K.

 

What does a true front capable SM cost? probably pretty similar all in.

 

You have plenty of drama BS is both class's, so that is a wash......

 

I will add that Mazda, of all the OE's does provide the best overall support and appreciation for club drivers, and that is a real factor for consideration.

 

SRF is sometimes called Spec wrecker ford, SM is sometimes called Wreck Miata.  I don't think either is true in general, but both class's have their moments. Usually Mid pack and back. Miatas have dents, SRF has duct tape.

 

My advise, if you have the funds: Rent one of each, and go with what suits you better personally.


  • Mike Colangelo, Danica Davison and Preston Pardus like this

#28
Wolfgang

Wolfgang

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Location:Maryland
In The SRF forums, SM is called Spec PiƱata. I've seen more frequent and worse wrecks in SRF.

#29
Danica Davison

Danica Davison

    Always the bridesmaid never the bride

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 678 posts
  • Location:Jacksonville Biatch
  • Region:Central Florida
  • Car Year:1999
  • Car Number:10

And we call them Spec Wrecker Fords


John Davison
Autotechnik Racing / 5x Racing
2016 - Central Florida Region Champion
2017 - The People's Champion
2017 - President of DSFC
#itcouldbeyou

Series Champ - Won a points based series in a Spec Miata Chatterbox - Blah blah blah... Blah blah blah Instigator - Made a topic or post that inspired other We have a Winnah! - Won their 1st race... Congratulations! Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#30
Mike Colangelo

Mike Colangelo

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 87 posts
  • Region:Cal Club (SoCal)

SRF3 (the recently updated SRF) seems like a great class.  These cars a notably faster than both SM and SRF2 cars. 

 

The biggest drawback I see with SRF3 is the cost of entry.  Something on the order of $30K+ for a good SRF3.  But it now has a modern engine and is a true spec class, unlike SM.



#31
Mark

Mark

    Member

  • SMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles
  • Region:Sopac

30k+ easy. Great resale value though so value is retained when it comes time to exit.


  • Mike Colangelo likes this

Mark
markn@ironcanyonmotorsports.com
Iron Canyon Motorsports

Make it Rain - Made Paypal donation of $100+ Bona fide - A bonafide Spec Miata driver

#32
DavidNJ

DavidNJ

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Location:New Jersey

SRF3 (the recently updated SRF) seems like a great class.  These cars a notably faster than both SM and SRF2 cars. 

 

The biggest drawback I see with SRF3 is the cost of entry.  Something on the order of $30K+ for a good SRF3.  But it now has a modern engine and is a true spec class, unlike SM.

 

However, it still has a frame and safety equipment from 1983...and really looking like a late 1970s Formula Ford. Driver's often sit pretty high up and proud of the cage with the roll hoop not that far above. The current containment-like head restraint has no shoulder restraint. It is also fixed to the car, requiring the driver to move forward and twist to get out; in current formula cars they pop in and out letting the driver have relatively easy access. They have just introduced a wider fiberglass seat designed to be used with a driver specific foam liner which is common in formula cars (although, I believe most have carbon fiber seat shells).

Adjusted for inflation, the original $10k price would be $17.5k. It is now over $42k; however, competitive Spec Miatas aren't cheap either. Crash damage is often less than Spec Miata, although those huge 1970s style fiberglass body panels (designed to look like a 1967/68 sports racer) are expensive and usually patched. Resale value as a percent of purchase price also seems better. 

30k+ easy. Great resale value though so value is retained when it comes time to exit.

 

Will that always be the case? How long can a car with a body designed to look like a 50 year old race car, a chassis similar to a 40 year old race car, be an attractive racing solution? Are there more or fewer races for Spec Racer Fords? Are the fields bigger or smaller?

And we call them Spec Wrecker Fords

 

And what do your call Spec Miata? Spec Bumper Car? From my analysis, the Spec Miata seems to have closer competition (measured as cars within 2 seconds of the pole) than Spec Racer Ford.



#33
Wolfgang

Wolfgang

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Location:Maryland
The newish Ford Racing engine is nice, for sure. The 40-odd hp increase and 50-lb weight loss in the rear totally changed the car's dynamics. The engine is the only modern part of the car, though. As noted above, there were no improvements toward crash protection. The transaxle is getting old and parts for rebuilds will be hard to get, probably another upgrade in the future. Anyone interested in SFR3--go for it! But talk over operating costs with a CSR beforehand and look at safety carefully.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users