Runoffs vs NASA Nat's SM year.....
#1
Posted 08-25-2011 01:16 PM
Although the year is not published on the NASA entry list, I can tell you, there are ALOT less 99's.....
Discuss......
Phew...... that was a close one!
Tony Senese
NASA-NE SM Director
'06, '08, '11, '12, '13, '14
NASA-NE SM champ
#2
Posted 08-25-2011 01:27 PM
#3
Posted 08-25-2011 01:37 PM
I'd say we're close to parity between organizations.
#4
Posted 08-25-2011 03:07 PM
At first glance the 2011 SCCA runoff field consists of 22-1999's 4-1994-1997's and 6-1990 to 1993's.....
Although the year is not published on the NASA entry list, I can tell you, there are ALOT less 99's.....
Discuss......
We have already discussed this in several threads, throughout the entire summer. What is there to discuss now?
K. Webb
Powered by East Street Racing (Best engines in Spec Miata)
Driver coach, Spec Miata Prep shop, Spec Miata Setup
2016 Hard Charger award passing 12 cars runoffs 2016 Mid Ohio
2016 P3 RUNOFFS OVER 40 DIVISION LOL!
2015 First consolation prize Northern Conference Majors Title Pageant
2015 Winner Circus Cat Majors Road America
2015 Winner BlackHawk Majors crash fest
My Signature is still not as long as Danny boy's
#5
Posted 08-25-2011 03:27 PM
Yep, already been discussed at length. It will be interesting to see how the 99 does at Mid-O and if any changes are needed for NASA rules next year. After seeing the 99 run with the lower weight in NASA trim at my local tracks I would have to say that the car is really close as is, but certainly not the car to have at most tracks.We have already discussed this in several threads, throughout the entire summer. What is there to discuss now?
#6
Posted 08-27-2011 07:11 AM
At first glance the 2011 SCCA runoff field consists of 22-1999's 4-1994-1997's and 6-1990 to 1993's.....
Although the year is not published on the NASA entry list, I can tell you, there are ALOT less 99's.....
Discuss......
You can get the year for NASA Nationals under the number assignment link.
28 total cars as of 8/19 with the below breakdown:
90-93: 15
94-97: 5
99+: 8
#7
Posted 08-27-2011 10:59 AM
Yep, already been discussed at length. It will be interesting to see how the 99 does at Mid-O and if any changes are needed for NASA rules next year. After seeing the 99 run with the lower weight in NASA trim at my local tracks I would have to say that the car is really close as is, but certainly not the car to have at most tracks.
Which car are you taking Gale? Your 99 or your 1.6?
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#8
Posted 08-27-2011 12:29 PM
#9
Posted 08-28-2011 06:26 AM
Which car are you taking Gale? Your 99 or your 1.6?
If I had not sold the 1.8 that car would have been my choice. But since the 99 and 1.6 are so even I chose the one that's more fun to drive and i like the pop up headlights
#10
Posted 08-28-2011 06:32 AM
If I had not sold the 1.8 that car would have been my choice. But since the 99 and 1.6 are so even I chose the one that's more fun to drive and i like the pop up headlights
Good choosing!
K. Webb
Powered by East Street Racing (Best engines in Spec Miata)
Driver coach, Spec Miata Prep shop, Spec Miata Setup
2016 Hard Charger award passing 12 cars runoffs 2016 Mid Ohio
2016 P3 RUNOFFS OVER 40 DIVISION LOL!
2015 First consolation prize Northern Conference Majors Title Pageant
2015 Winner Circus Cat Majors Road America
2015 Winner BlackHawk Majors crash fest
My Signature is still not as long as Danny boy's
#11
Posted 08-29-2011 01:35 PM
If I had not sold the 1.8 that car would have been my choice. But since the 99 and 1.6 are so even I chose the one that's more fun to drive and i like the pop up headlights
Riiiiight.
Alex Bolanos - #57
Sponsored by Autotechnik, Momo USA, Apex Alignment, and Amazon.com
#12
Posted 08-29-2011 02:06 PM
#13
Posted 08-29-2011 02:13 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users