Cars shall display the correct minimum weight specified in the current GCR
#1
Posted 12-16-2011 02:23 PM
#4350 – May
In 9.3.29, add a new section D as follows:
"Except for classes in which there is only 1 required minimum weight (i.e., ASR, FB, FC, FE, FF, FM, FS, FST, FV, SM5, SRF), all cars shall display the correct minimum weight specified in the current GCR using numbers that are a minimum of two inches in height and are within 6 inches of the class designation in a manner that is clearly legible to the scrutineers at the scales. Cars that are run in more than one class must display the correct minimum weight for each class so that it is clear which weight applies to each class."
[The CRB has modified the text in response to member input. The grayed out text is removed and replace by the remaining text in that sentence.]
#2
Posted 12-16-2011 02:50 PM
Should just do the NASA thing with a decal on the B pilliar or rear window.
- Alberto and FTodaro like this
#3
Posted 12-16-2011 02:56 PM
Former driver
#4
Posted 12-16-2011 03:36 PM
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#5
Posted 12-16-2011 04:40 PM
Violation of the rule as written................"display the correct minimum weight" ...the Clown will throw paper.......I decided to take a 1.5 lb penalty in STL for the sake of simplicity...
Glenn Murphey, Crew Chief
Owner Crew Chief Services The Pinnacle of Excellence, Contract Crew Services for the racing community.
Soon to be back in the club racing scene for good
#6
Posted 12-16-2011 04:43 PM
- Glenn likes this
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#7
Posted 12-16-2011 05:07 PM
#8
Posted 12-16-2011 05:08 PM
1068.182Kg
Thanks Tom for that smart A$$ response....LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Glenn Murphey, Crew Chief
Owner Crew Chief Services The Pinnacle of Excellence, Contract Crew Services for the racing community.
Soon to be back in the club racing scene for good
#9
Posted 12-16-2011 05:12 PM
#10
Posted 12-16-2011 06:42 PM
#11
Posted 12-16-2011 09:47 PM
Noun: A thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, esp. a story with a funny punchline. Verb: Make jokes; talk humorously or flippantly. Synonyms:
noun. jest - fun - jape - gag - trick - pleasantry - lark
verb. jest - jape - banter - lark - kid - josh
What is that, in stone anyway? Well it's 171.428571 stone. Good thing you caught that, I was just about to set my ride height in palms and digits...
#12
Posted 12-16-2011 10:36 PM
MOTION (Patullo/Walsh) to approve the rule change #4350 to the GCR. PASSED 10-3. Opposed Gordy, Merideth and Jones.
#4350 – May
In 9.3.29, add a new section D as follows:
"Except for classes in which there is only 1 required minimum weight (i.e., ASR, FB, FC, FE, FF, FM, FS, FST, FV, SM5, SRF), all cars shall display the correct minimum weight specified in the current GCRusing numbers that are aminimum of two inches in height and are within 6 inches of the class designationin a manner that is clearly legible to the scrutineers at the scales. Cars that are run in more than one class must display the correct minimum weight for each class so that it is clear which weight applies to each class."
[The CRB has modified the text in response to member input. The grayed out text is removed and replace by the remaining text in that sentence.]
Unfortunately, when this was published in Fastrack, formatting was lost - note that there is no grayed out text. I have shown the change with strikeouts. There will be a Racing Memo making this official very soon.
Dave
#13
Posted 12-16-2011 11:02 PM
#14
Posted 12-17-2011 03:50 AM
When I get asked "How much are you supposed to weigh?" I just point. After 3 or 4 times they remember where to look.
I say that my cardiologist says I should be about 215 but my primary says 250 for my frame is fine.... Oh, you mean the car? The scrutineer should know by your class the weight but with all the weights in SM it's not too difficult to get a consistent placement for the weight info. Much like you did with tape and Sharpie. In stock cars we had the tech decal on the front most portion of the roof, driver's side and on karts on the fairing and also had the class so I didn't point to a weight that that I made up. The scrutineer asking the driver about the rules doesn't make any sense to me.
#15
Posted 12-17-2011 08:31 AM
The scrutineer asking the driver about the rules doesn't make any sense to me.
Hummm, I remember getting a 100# pass in tech once for just this same mistake on the part of the scrutineer
Glenn Murphey, Crew Chief
Owner Crew Chief Services The Pinnacle of Excellence, Contract Crew Services for the racing community.
Soon to be back in the club racing scene for good
#16
Posted 12-17-2011 08:44 PM
- Glenn and Cnj like this
#17
Posted 12-19-2011 09:37 PM
In 9.3.29, add a new section D as follows:
"Except for classes in which there is only 1 required minimum weight (i.e., ASR,
FB, FC, FE, FM, FS, FST, FV, SM5, SRF), all cars shall display the correct
minimum weight specified in the current GCR
minimum of two inches in height and are within 6 inches of the class
designation
Cars that are run in more than one class must display the correct minimum
weight for each class so that it is clear which weight applies to each class."
http://scca.cdn.race...ts/RM_11-13.pdf
Frank
TnT Racing
SCCA Ohio Valley Region
#18
Posted 12-20-2011 12:11 PM
Tell me what color and font you want and I'll cut you some very elegant vinyl numbers, Rob. Merry Christmas.
Thanks, but that wasn't my beef. I have no less than 6 classes on the side of my car.
SM, ITA, STU, PTE, E3, TTE
With NASA's big number requirement and the small size of our doors, sticker real estate gets to be an issue. Not to mention that the sides are where all the sponsors and contingency payers want to be as well.
Thank goodness they backed off on the 2 inch numbers next to the class letters. rear window sticker FTW
#19
Posted 12-20-2011 12:29 PM
J~
#20
Posted 12-20-2011 01:14 PM
I was thinking on the rear window, behind you, so not to block your view, a list in your case. J~
yeah, I can't find a link to those nasa power and weight stickers for the window just behind the b pillar. Something like that would be good.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users