
Extended Wheel Stud, Lug Nut Torque?
#1
Posted 04-08-2012 11:56 AM

#2
Posted 04-08-2012 12:09 PM

After installing the new studs, went to torque everything back down and noticed there is no new torque spec given. We tried to do the math ourselves for bolt stretch and were coming up with just shy of 120 ft/lbs. Anyone happen to know what is recommended? I got the ARP studs with the KJZ lug nuts from saferacer.
Torque at 75 MAX. Will have to check a few times to make sure the stud is seated properly too. Also new wheels need to be retorqued until the powder coat is worn off.....dont ask how I know

Glenn Murphey, Crew Chief
Owner Crew Chief Services The Pinnacle of Excellence, Contract Crew Services for the racing community.
Soon to be back in the club racing scene for good



#3
Posted 04-08-2012 12:09 PM

#4
Posted 04-09-2012 08:19 AM

New wheels should have each nut run on and off about 10 times. This is much easier with the long studs. This will wear away the powder coating from the nut surface on the wheel. Otherwise, when the wheel gets hot, the powder will get soft, the nut will come loose and can fall off.
New studs shoulkd also be checked for torque after every session, just to make sure they got seated good on initial install.
Dave
Dave Wheeler
Advanced Autosports, the nations most complete Spec Miata shop
Author, Spec Miata Constructors Guide, version 1 and 2.0
Building Championship winning cars since 1995
4 time Central Division Spec Miata Champion car builder 2012-2013-2014-2017
Back to Back June Sprints Spec Miata 1-2 finishes 2016 and 2017
5 time June Sprints winner in Mazda's
6 Time Northern Conference Champion Car Builder
2014 SCCA Majors National point Champion car builder
2014 SCCA Runoffs winner, T4 (Bender)
2014 Central Division Champion, ITS (Wheeler)
2013 Thunderhill 25 hour winning crew chief
2007 June Sprints winner, (GT1, Mohrhauser)
Over 200 race wins and counting.
www.advanced-autosports.com
dave@advanced-autosports.com
608-313-1230





#5
Posted 04-09-2012 09:20 AM

#6
Posted 04-09-2012 09:33 AM

#7
Posted 04-09-2012 11:09 AM

Out of curiousity, has anyone tried to contact ARP with their recommended torque rating?
#8
Posted 04-09-2012 11:19 AM

OR
You can just believe the guys who do this for 12 cars 20 weekends a year for the last 10 years. 65 is enough
Dave
- Glenn and Armando Ramirez like this
Dave Wheeler
Advanced Autosports, the nations most complete Spec Miata shop
Author, Spec Miata Constructors Guide, version 1 and 2.0
Building Championship winning cars since 1995
4 time Central Division Spec Miata Champion car builder 2012-2013-2014-2017
Back to Back June Sprints Spec Miata 1-2 finishes 2016 and 2017
5 time June Sprints winner in Mazda's
6 Time Northern Conference Champion Car Builder
2014 SCCA Majors National point Champion car builder
2014 SCCA Runoffs winner, T4 (Bender)
2014 Central Division Champion, ITS (Wheeler)
2013 Thunderhill 25 hour winning crew chief
2007 June Sprints winner, (GT1, Mohrhauser)
Over 200 race wins and counting.
www.advanced-autosports.com
dave@advanced-autosports.com
608-313-1230





#9
Posted 04-09-2012 01:33 PM


#10
Posted 04-09-2012 01:53 PM

I guess I am not understanding why we are torquing the lug nuts to spec, or even less, when we are installing a higher grade stud. I understand the new wheels and wearing off the powdercoating part which I agree with. The part I necessarily don't agree with is the low torque spec. When installing any bolt or nut, the desired torque is when the bolt or stud begins to stretch depending on the size and grade. I agree that overstretching will fatigue the stud and cause it not to return to its original length. Maybe I'm looking into this too much but I just don't want any problems over something so simple.
The spec is written around street use, not racing. In racing, we put a lot higher side loads on the car that go into the studs. Torque them too close to the yield point and then flog them around a race track where you're increasing the stress significantly over what it is sitting still and you've got potential problems. Torque them to the point where you know the wheels won't fall off (sounds like 65 works, I use 80 but I like the battery life aspect) and your studs will never fatigue.



#11
Posted 04-09-2012 02:46 PM

Yes, you have "overthought" the issue. But at the risk of encouraging such overthinking it would be an interesting thing to model using a CAD program as a static load on the wheel. There was a recent article in Grass Roots Motorsports on the use of CAD programs at the club racing level. Not a critical thing to model, but an interesting problem as a way of learning a new CAD program.
I've run into one person who varies their torque based on if there's fresh anti-seize goop on the studs. Sort of a wet vs. dry torque setting.


#12
Posted 04-09-2012 03:49 PM

Interestingly though there is a counter-argument, which is, since the stretching forces are higher more tension is needed to hold the wheel snug to the hub.
I don't know that's true. Stress (force) and strain (stretch) are proportional up to yield (load where it never returns to quite the original length) Once you reach yield, quickly less and less force is required to make the bolt stretch. Torque it to 60 or 80 and the initial stretch will be different but add in the same cornering forces and exactly the same additional stretching will occur unless you reached the yield point. Torquing the nut, you're just applying enough tensions so that it's always preloaded whether you're pushing or pulling it in order to to keep the nut from falling off. Overtighten and you limit the additional force you can put in before the bugger snaps. Interesting though. Something that someone with more free time than me to model.



#13
Posted 04-09-2012 04:39 PM

But you guys are WAY above my pay grade.
Dave
Dave Wheeler
Advanced Autosports, the nations most complete Spec Miata shop
Author, Spec Miata Constructors Guide, version 1 and 2.0
Building Championship winning cars since 1995
4 time Central Division Spec Miata Champion car builder 2012-2013-2014-2017
Back to Back June Sprints Spec Miata 1-2 finishes 2016 and 2017
5 time June Sprints winner in Mazda's
6 Time Northern Conference Champion Car Builder
2014 SCCA Majors National point Champion car builder
2014 SCCA Runoffs winner, T4 (Bender)
2014 Central Division Champion, ITS (Wheeler)
2013 Thunderhill 25 hour winning crew chief
2007 June Sprints winner, (GT1, Mohrhauser)
Over 200 race wins and counting.
www.advanced-autosports.com
dave@advanced-autosports.com
608-313-1230





#14
Posted 04-09-2012 04:48 PM




#15
Posted 04-09-2012 05:40 PM

#16
Posted 04-10-2012 08:43 AM

I am sticking to 65
- Glenn likes this
Dave Wheeler
Advanced Autosports, the nations most complete Spec Miata shop
Author, Spec Miata Constructors Guide, version 1 and 2.0
Building Championship winning cars since 1995
4 time Central Division Spec Miata Champion car builder 2012-2013-2014-2017
Back to Back June Sprints Spec Miata 1-2 finishes 2016 and 2017
5 time June Sprints winner in Mazda's
6 Time Northern Conference Champion Car Builder
2014 SCCA Majors National point Champion car builder
2014 SCCA Runoffs winner, T4 (Bender)
2014 Central Division Champion, ITS (Wheeler)
2013 Thunderhill 25 hour winning crew chief
2007 June Sprints winner, (GT1, Mohrhauser)
Over 200 race wins and counting.
www.advanced-autosports.com
dave@advanced-autosports.com
608-313-1230





#17
Posted 04-10-2012 12:23 PM

#18
Posted 04-10-2012 02:15 PM

My head hurts
I am sticking to 65
Perfect for those AARP studs.

- dstevens, Glenn and Armando Ramirez like this
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users