Sign In
Create Account
Thank you Redline Oil
http://www.redlineoi...cle.aspx?id=320
Redline Oil
Started by
Jim Drago
, 12-18-2012 12:21 PM
#1
Posted 12-18-2012 12:21 PM
Jim Drago
-
- Administrators
-
- 6,567 posts
East Street Racing / 2 Time National Champion
- Location:Memphis, Tn
- Region:Mid South
- Car Year:2005
- Car Number:2
Back to top
Report
#2
Posted 12-18-2012 06:01 PM
FTodaro
-
- SMembers
-
- 3,084 posts
Veteran Member
- Location:Columbus Ohio
- Region:Great Lakes
- Car Year:2001
- Car Number:35
#3
Posted 01-14-2020 07:40 PM
luvin_the_rings
-
- Members
-
- 204 posts
Member
- Location:Los Angeles, CA
- Car Year:1990
#4
Posted 01-14-2020 09:38 PM
FTodaro
-
- SMembers
-
- 3,084 posts
Veteran Member
- Location:Columbus Ohio
- Region:Great Lakes
- Car Year:2001
- Car Number:35
No, I use MT-85. I think MTL is to thin and does not protect the soft shift forks we have, 90 is ok too.
Frank
TnT Racing
SCCA Ohio Valley Region
#5
Posted 01-14-2020 10:09 PM
Steve Scheifler
-
- Members
-
- 2,816 posts
Veteran Member
Running the oil, or just the stickers? (Not unusual to be different). I’d gladly put their stickers on my car for some consideration, but I’ll keep Ford XT-M5-QS in my transmission (or something more exotic that I save for special occasions).
#6
Posted 01-15-2020 11:02 AM
Jim Drago
-
- Administrators
-
- 6,567 posts
East Street Racing / 2 Time National Champion
- Location:Memphis, Tn
- Region:Mid South
- Car Year:2005
- Car Number:2
No, I use MT-85. I think MTL is to thin and does not protect the soft shift forks we have, 90 is ok too.
Been running MTL for years, have less transmissions issues than 99% of the class.
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#7
Posted 01-15-2020 01:23 PM
Alberto
-
- Members
-
- 1,471 posts
Veteran Member
- Location:Mountain View, CA
- Region:SFR
- Car Year:1990
I run MT90 since it is hot out here in CA and for a bit of extra overhead on temps due to the thicker viscosity (hopefully). I generally change annually depending on usage. YMMV...
#8
Posted 01-15-2020 01:36 PM
Steve Scheifler
-
- Members
-
- 2,816 posts
Veteran Member
I run MT90 since it is hot out here in CA and for a bit of extra overhead on temps due to the thicker viscosity (hopefully). I generally change annually depending on usage. YMMV...
Ah, but isn’t there an argument to be made that an oil which is lower in viscosity initially reduces friction and therefore heat? What you want is something that creates an oil film which withstands the pressure with the least resistance (friction...heat) and doesn’t break down quickly from the heat that is produced. And because we have synchronized boxes it needs to be synchro friendly.
#9
Posted 01-16-2020 05:47 PM
Alberto
-
- Members
-
- 1,471 posts
Veteran Member
- Location:Mountain View, CA
- Region:SFR
- Car Year:1990
Ah, but isn’t there an argument to be made that an oil which is lower in viscosity initially reduces friction and therefore heat? What you want is something that creates an oil film which withstands the pressure with the least resistance (friction...heat) and doesn’t break down quickly from the heat that is produced. And because we have synchronized boxes it needs to be synchro friendly.
Yes 
Except, I am assuming (hoping maybe?) that a 90 weight oil will not break down as quickly over time as an 80 weight oil from the heat that is produced.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
