The title of the video is enough to prove Joey is a great driver in a great car, don't think anyone can argue with that. However, I disagree that video isn't data. Yes, there are a million variables at play here, but you can cancel all of them out on the straightaway, which is the part of the video I am focusing on. I know how much hp/tq my car was making (good for a 1.6), and how much hp/tq Ron's car was making (good for an NA 1.8). We are running about the exact same power weight ratio, with his extra 3-4hp being countered by the extra 50lbs. What's not addressed is torque, which can be seen twice between 3:38 and 4:05. First, Joey is making a pass into the final turn before the straight. Because of this, he is only able to use half the road, yet the torque still allows him to come out at the same speed, if not faster, than I do. I do not think he would have had the same exit speed if he were in a 1.6. Again, lots of variables at play here, so let's focus on the second point, just the straightaway. Right before we shift to 4th, it is clearly visible that we are going very very similar, if not identical, speeds. However, when we shift to 4th, he gains 2mph on the get go. That is torque, not a draft. The draft is effective, but not worth 4 car lengths over the course of 4th gear. Also, I do not deny I am useless when it comes to setup, tuning, or mechanical experience. However, I don't see how that is relevant if I have my dyno results to prove the motor was good. Either way, I will be driving a top prep 1.6 this year and we will see how much I was missing last year.
As for heat soak, that is an NA issue, and I think the '97 could benefit from the turn signal intake ducts I have mentioned in other threads. I am not denying that the 1.8 NA needs help, I just think the 1.6 needs it more. Also, is there a difference between the '97 and '95 that I am not aware of?