I did an alignment on my VVT last night -3.6 in the rears, and it was low but not on the stops. Who here can feel the difference between 3.6 and 4.
To satisfy Novak, i will support the majority vote of the group. Part of my negativity is i hate seeing a rule change proposal on the heals of a violation. I still question the need to run the big camber in the rear, my guess is i do not have the talent to take advantage of it.
I understand the concern that those who may be getting 3.1 and want 3.5 and don't want to swap out sub frames. I guess we just have to decide as a class what way we want to go.
I sure as hell would not support any type of rule that has a pre-set camber or RH limit in tech that is just asking for trouble. The set up and camber on your car is only an advantage if it complements your driving style.