Thread hijack - hope it's not offensive ...
For those who have installed coolant sensors in a radiator hose, did you choose the top hose or bottom, and why?
I've ordered one of these to install both a temp and pressure sensor (it has two ports): http://www.advanced-...products_id=123
Regarding radiator shrouding, I looked at mine and decided it'd be a winter project because it needs shrouding on top, bottom and both sides.
I have this adapter installed in mine ('96) with a Mishimoto radiator. Have both a temp gauge & high-temp light installed in it. Both the adapter & radiator work well...only complaint is the radiator's thickness requires some interesting cuts/rotations of the various hose bits to make it all fit in a smaller space.
My interpretation of the "shroud rule" is if you want to run one at the top, the only one you can run is the referenced Mazda part number.
The linked-to MX5 Racing metal shroud would be protest-bait (weenie protest IMHO) if one wished to pursue it.
On the (literally) flip side, it would appear that running without the undertray would also be protest-bait since it does not say you can remove it.
Why someone would want to is beyond me as without it I believe you lose cooling efficiency.
For the "any radiator" interpretation, you may run literally 'any' radiator (per the GCR definition) you want in the factory location and position (behind the support panel in a vertical orientation). However if it's smaller in any dimension (width/height) from the factory, any openings into the engine bay must be sealed/covered. I presume this is to prevent any additional airflow into the bay to possibly improve engine performance.
Now, what's to stop someone from designing a radiator with an 'extra large' flange/bracket on the top which serves to perform the same function as the Mazda part number?
That is what they call the 'gray area' of the rules and has not yet been determined via protest or CRB letter.
*looks at the GCR's redefinition of a "muffler"* 