
1.6 Minimum achieveable SM weight?
#21
Posted 03-04-2011 02:33 PM

Pat



#22
Posted 03-04-2011 03:23 PM

Mike, why would you call my post stirring the pot? Everyone talks about the 1.6 weight but minimal talk about the 99 weight.
EDIT: No one ever talks about being over weight in a 99. Hmmm....
What's the finished weight of a well done 99 with a minimal wall/tube cage & no driver?
In my tub up rotessiere built 99 I have a 5 lb fire system, 2 gauges, no other extras and I run 34 lb of ballast and I weigh 242 in my gear.








#23
Posted 03-04-2011 03:25 PM









#24
Posted 03-04-2011 07:01 PM

Pat



#25
Posted 03-04-2011 07:06 PM

In my tub up rotessiere built 99 I have a 5 lb fire system, 2 gauges, no other extras and I run 34 lb of ballast and I weigh 242 in my gear.
Thanks Mike



#26
Posted 03-04-2011 07:12 PM

I have 2 customers in 1.6 cars that weigh 220 plus and can be under weight.
WOW....I weighed 225 last year in full gear in my 1.6 and the lowest I weighed post race with minimal fuel was 2297....and that was with a viscous diff. Now running a torsen and weigh 245....yikes!
Will have to stay off the scales unless by some miracle I have to weigh. Not sure I want to know....



#27
Posted 03-04-2011 07:52 PM

I am sure the cage is the variable that makes some heavier than others.
I just saved about 20# using 13 ga footing and plinth rather than 3/16". It's almost 10# savings using 13 ga over 1/8". Did you take the AC condenser out and add an AC delete tube and remove all the E brake hardware?
#28
Posted 03-04-2011 09:01 PM




#29
Posted 03-05-2011 10:17 AM

You must remove the dash during the build, the insulation blanket on the firewall is a real bitch to remove, but it weighs 17 pounds. The ac evaporator in the dash is another 4-5 and the air bag controllers are another 2 pounds.
Nascar bars only add about a foot of additional tubing or 4 pounds. Gutting the door completly is about 20 pounds per door. Net gain of 30 pounds.
Bondo weighs a lot. If your car has had body repair and you just layereed an inch of bondo on the quarter panel, you may have added 10 pounds.
I build a lite car, but not by using a lite cage. I use 1 5/8" tubing that adds 8 pounds of extra weight over 1/5" tubing. It is also about 60% stronger. My rear tubes go all the way back by the battery, I run both a rear diagonal and a rear cross bar in the trunk. My dash bar alone is 4 feet long. All together I have about 60 feet of tubing in the car. And I can still get a 1.6 with no driver no fuel down to about 2040. My 99s come in right around 2100.
We are finishing a new build on a very nice arizona chassis. No bondo that I can tell and no cool suit, gauges or other pound adders. When we finish in about a week, I will give you the exact weight.
Dave
Dave Wheeler
Advanced Autosports, the nations most complete Spec Miata shop
Author, Spec Miata Constructors Guide, version 1 and 2.0
Building Championship winning cars since 1995
4 time Central Division Spec Miata Champion car builder 2012-2013-2014-2017
Back to Back June Sprints Spec Miata 1-2 finishes 2016 and 2017
5 time June Sprints winner in Mazda's
6 Time Northern Conference Champion Car Builder
2014 SCCA Majors National point Champion car builder
2014 SCCA Runoffs winner, T4 (Bender)
2014 Central Division Champion, ITS (Wheeler)
2013 Thunderhill 25 hour winning crew chief
2007 June Sprints winner, (GT1, Mohrhauser)
Over 200 race wins and counting.
www.advanced-autosports.com
dave@advanced-autosports.com
608-313-1230





#30
Posted 03-05-2011 10:33 AM

-bw
I have an opinion so I must be right




#31
Posted 03-05-2011 06:56 PM

I build a lite car, but not by using a lite cage. I use 1 5/8" tubing that adds 8 pounds of extra weight over 1/5" tubing. It is also about 60% stronger.
How do you quantify that 60% number for a completed assembly?
When I looked at the footings I used formulae from Machinery's Handbook but the ones I used only determine static stress and theoretical deflection. I did it for twice the weight of the car, estimated at 4000#. The difference between using 3/16ths and 13 ga for those plate sizes were minimal. At that point the likely failure point is the vehicle structure, not the footings or plinith. If I had a light driver I'd use 1/4" as I could add another 40-50 lbs in equal points around the car instead of ballasting 50# on the passenger side. But I have a heavy driver that will be lucky to make 260# suited. And that is after the driver loses 40#.
#32
Posted 03-06-2011 10:07 AM


#33
Posted 03-06-2011 10:08 AM

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users