
New Oregon Class - IT-J
#21
Posted 01-05-2012 03:42 PM

Do the Regional Directors across the country get together to talk about this, brainstorm, tell whats worked for them???
J~








#22
Posted 01-05-2012 06:55 PM

#23
Posted 01-05-2012 08:45 PM

Bruce you know me. Not intended as an Oregon slight at all. I understand the need to want more entries and look at it as a potential revenue generator. However I think the loss in market share, competiting organizations and lack of entries are not entirely due to economic circumstances. The SCCA should focus on what it does, be the best at it and then and only then will its market share increase. If we continue to look at stop gap, loss prevention type things we are cheapening what we do. All we need to do is be the best, offer the best product experience and value and attandence will increase. I am not a fan of the crap can class, even some folks think there cars are "OK" or safe.
I hear you Mike and wish it wasn't such an issue, so we didn't have to cheapen what we do. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Who knew that there were thousands of drivers out there that wanted to race, but just needed a quick easy way to get started. To make this work well, we'll need to embrace this new crowd and teach them why crapcans rules are much harder to enforce and that they'll end up spending just as much for maintence, tires, fuel, etc. I/you know that it's not that insurmountable task to do it the right way and that there is a huge amount of satisfaction in presenting a well prepped, maintained, and clean racing machine and how that is a big part of what we love about this sport. We just need to help those newly aflicted racers along in their maturity process.
- Keith Novak likes this
I have an opinion so I must be right




#24
Posted 01-05-2012 09:21 PM

well prepped, maintained, and clean racing machine and how that is a big part of what we love about this sport.
We?
fast, dirty, and ugly forever!



#25
Posted 01-05-2012 11:57 PM

I hear you Mike and wish it wasn't such an issue, so we didn't have to cheapen what we do.
I'm sure the Porsche, GT, and formula racers figure they cheapened their sport a bit to let us race, too.

#26
Posted 01-06-2012 12:01 AM

We?
fast, dirty, and ugly forever!
Ha, I have no choice, all my friends have the clean extra fast show cars, and they won't help me fix mine if they get dirty doing it

I have an opinion so I must be right




#27
Posted 01-06-2012 12:08 AM

I'm sure the Porsche, GT, and formula racers figure they cheapened their sport a bit to let us race, too.
Mr. Perspective

Of course that doesn't include the 99s

I have an opinion so I must be right




#28
Posted 01-06-2012 12:10 AM

#29
Posted 01-06-2012 02:01 AM

#30
Posted 01-06-2012 08:11 AM

- Glenn likes this








#31
Posted 01-06-2012 10:06 AM



#32
Posted 01-06-2012 11:59 AM

THis BIG boned 6'4" 250lbs SM driver is cutting weight to get below 220 and will be campaigning a ridiculous 1.6 this year! I am tired of the Dewurst whinning.
Driving a 1.6 keeps me healthy. My doctor said I didn' realize how much of a favor I did myself losing 30 pounds!
I have an opinion so I must be right




#33
Posted 01-06-2012 10:34 PM

Overall participation in the class was not great. I think that was due to the team car ownership aspect of most "crap can" racecars. You're always driving a 75% borrowed car. A weekend with a single-driver group like SCCA or NASA isn't very fair when only one of four team members gets to participate.
I hope the folks in Oregon Region have worked out how to tech the Chump/Lemons cars. I ran into several issues where things that were allowed in chump weren't compatible with the basic GCR. They weren't really safety issues, but rather things like a lack of a fuel test port and functional OEM ABS.
#34
Posted 01-08-2012 04:57 PM

This is a side race for them you can not beat the seat time for the $$$. and J for junk does not mean all the cars out there in our series will blow up in 30 minutes. I have been to a good 12 races in the last 2 years and in the series only a handful of cars popped and engine or transmission. So on average 6 out of maybe 1000 cars we have raced with have problems which result in crap/fluids on the track. Most of the reasons cars do not finish are electrical 10 year old coil packs or corroded wiring. Yes are cars look like a pile of crap but mechanically most are sound and have strict safety regulations that need to be followed. I hope to see this movement eastward
Http://tferacing.com
#35
Posted 01-08-2012 08:07 PM

#36
Posted 01-09-2012 08:32 AM

#37
Posted 01-15-2012 04:48 PM

#44 Team KBR/KKRProducts.com Spec Miata
#44 Team KBR/Dick Hannah Kia Rio B-Spec/ World Challenge TCB
#16 & #36 Blairco Spec Miata's, ICSCC
2014 SCCA B-Spec National Champion
Dick Hannah Dealerships | Kia Racing | Team-KBR.com | KKRProducts.com | DBB | Fast Specialties | Blairco Heating | SBOX Engineering | Sikk Shades by Eddie Bauer, JR | Hawk Performance

#38
Posted 01-17-2012 11:24 PM

Hopefully with a pile of crap cans and the added bunch of drifters, we'll see the entry fees go down a bit. Not going to pay another $560 entry fee for Rose Cup again.
Track rental, insurance and other costs aren't going down. The only way to keep fees down is to have more participants or charge more money or some combination of the two.




#39
Posted 01-18-2012 10:27 AM

-bw
I have an opinion so I must be right




0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users