In a PM I got this...So what are your David Letterman top 5 or so.
J~
J~
I ask,
So what made NASA SoCal a 9 ?
Rob's reply,
No surprises and they have their sh!# together. That's it. Grids are posted hours in advance, few if any mistakes by officials, the event runs smoothly. They have an experienced friendly staff that are good at their jobs. The only beef I have is them being a little shorthanded corner worker wise and not cracking the whip on passes under caution and the pole accelerating early. No registration is nice too.
All their administrative stuff is fantastic, and if I get screwed, it's on track, not before the race.
I asked,
So Admin gets what. 3 points ?
Size of field, competition ? 6 ?
Good fields ? stiff competition ?
-1 for PUY / corner workers ?
Rob's reply,
I was leaving fields and competition out of it, and just grading on the regions ability to not f@#$ up my event-going experience.
SFR's doing what they did with the quick boards was pretty much an insta-fail and ensured they would be below a 5. Imagine if I came up from socal and was only racing SM and then got put in the rear thanks to their stupidass countdown. I would have gotten myself thrown out of SFR and maybe even SCCA after I went ballistic.
Also, keeping me entertained during my stay at the track is probably worthy of honorable mention. The free taco social open to all and the fact that they offer enduros certainly doesn't hurt my opinion of NASA. Contrast that to 3 days of ass sitting with SFR. Prices to add classes are much more reasonable with NASA, especially considering my car likely wont be competitive in the 2nd class.