Major compliance
#1
Posted 02-06-2014 10:57 AM
Let's see what you think. I have heard good and bad.
Jim
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#2
Posted 02-06-2014 11:23 AM
I have several thoughts on this topic. First and foremost I believe that tech is about validating the winners/leaders etc, not necessarily about catching someone. If people and things get caught in the process then so be it.
The Majors are supposed to be Elite level events. The drivers are certainly holding up their end of the bargain, but we have all read about some of the compliance checks at some of the Majors this year. It is my opinion that every Majors event must at a minimum tech the following:
- Weight - Top 3 plus 5 random after EVERY qualifying and race session. Qualifying times are too close to not weigh after qualifying.
- Fuel - Top 3 plus 3 random. As stated earlier this year the at track DC test will catch the guys running/blending E85.
- Whistler - Top 3 plus 2 random after Races only. I think it would take too much time after qualifying and probably not necessary.
- Hoods and Trunks Open - All cars during any impound.
- Restrictor Plates - Top 3 plus 3 random after every qualifying and race. We could seal the plate after the first inspection of a weekend with the seal stickers.
- Computers - Top 3 plus 3 Random. At a minimum a visual inspection of the box for evidence of tampering. Winners at the end of the weekend should have computers sent off to be checked. At some point SCCA had some sealed Mazda units that I think should be being used to swap out with the winners/podium from Saturday.
It is important to check some random cars as well. If it's only the podium then what incentive is there for cars further back to stay compliant?
I am sure with all of the people on this board we could come up with a list of items that require very little time and/or impact on the tech staff. Tools can be made, money can be found if needed to come up with the necessary items to perform an efficient reasonable tech at these Majors events.
My 1.5 cents..... Sean
- Muda, Marc Cefalo and Bad Rusty like this
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#3
Posted 02-06-2014 11:31 AM
#4
Posted 02-06-2014 11:37 AM
Or better yet, use the additional sanction fees already being paid.....
- Muda likes this
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#5
Posted 02-06-2014 11:53 AM
I second everything Sean suggested. We need more checks and checks on more people, not just podium.
James York
sponsored by:
Stan's Auto Center, Lafayette LA
powered by:
East Street Racing, Memphis TN
2003 Spec Miata
#03
#6
Posted 02-06-2014 11:56 AM
BTW, The tech we had at Sebring IMO ( all classes) was adequate. Not sure we could/should expect more than that less a protest or a specific program. I don't remember the specifics, but I know cars were weighed and whistled after qualifying and races. Some parts inspected, I honestly don't remember what else. I think they pulled manifolds or something after PBIR
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#7
Posted 02-06-2014 12:00 PM
Combo tech package/$ with SRF ?
Major Adequate Compliance
J~
#8
Posted 02-06-2014 12:04 PM
Hi Jim, So... What exactly are we getting for the increase in fees? How are these different from Nationals last year? Can we not ask for a basic consistent amount of tech without having to pay more for it? Glad to hear Sebring tech was acceptable.
Not trying to start Sh&% or throw anyone under the bus, just want to continue to improve upon these elite level events.
Thanks.... Sean
- Rob Burgoon likes this
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#9
Posted 02-06-2014 12:19 PM
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#10
Posted 02-06-2014 12:37 PM
Somebody mentioned in Drago's Facebook post about this subject that the PCA Club Racing is testing electronic devices for tech compliance. This is true.
I have been working with the PCA on creating a process to use AiM data loggers and then specialized data analysis tools to check for technical compliance. They debuted the system at Sebring last week and things went very well. The officials and the racers were very happy after the very first weekend.
AiM Sports is also working with the CTCC (Canadian Touring Car Championship) where they also are using AiM data loggers for technical compliance. CTCC balances different makes and models of cars with RPM and Boost limits and with the data gathered and specialized data analysis tools, the officials can determine in just a couple of minutes any excessive levels. Gearing is also checked.
These were their current concerns, we are able to work with them on new processes when they decide they need to check other items.
- Derrick Ambrose likes this
AiM Sports National Training Manager
#11
Posted 02-06-2014 12:48 PM
I like the idea, I think NASA along those lines.
But doesn't that mean the rules will change to parameters and not measurements ? (Digital and Analog)
Everyone cool with that ?
Or it's just a tech tool, for faster results of compliance ?
J~
#12
Posted 02-06-2014 03:18 PM
I have several thoughts on this topic. First and foremost I believe that tech is about validating the winners/leaders etc, not necessarily about catching someone. If people and things get caught in the process then so be it.
The Majors are supposed to be Elite level events. The drivers are certainly holding up their end of the bargain, but we have all read about some of the compliance checks at some of the Majors this year. It is my opinion that every Majors event must at a minimum tech the following:
- Weight - Top 3 plus 5 random after EVERY qualifying and race session. Qualifying times are too close to not weigh after qualifying.
- Fuel - Top 3 plus 3 random. As stated earlier this year the at track DC test will catch the guys running/blending E85.
- Whistler - Top 3 plus 2 random after Races only. I think it would take too much time after qualifying and probably not necessary.
- Hoods and Trunks Open - All cars during any impound.
- Restrictor Plates - Top 3 plus 3 random after every qualifying and race. We could seal the plate after the first inspection of a weekend with the seal stickers.
- Computers - Top 3 plus 3 Random. At a minimum a visual inspection of the box for evidence of tampering. Winners at the end of the weekend should have computers sent off to be checked. At some point SCCA had some sealed Mazda units that I think should be being used to swap out with the winners/podium from Saturday.
It is important to check some random cars as well. If it's only the podium then what incentive is there for cars further back to stay compliant?
I am sure with all of the people on this board we could come up with a list of items that require very little time and/or impact on the tech staff. Tools can be made, money can be found if needed to come up with the necessary items to perform an efficient reasonable tech at these Majors events.
My 1.5 cents..... Sean
I really like all of these, but I am really concerned about the computer/ECU. It is much much harder to check visually, and as we have seen/heard/suspected in the past, some people are exteremly creative in this process. I'm sure there is a digital version to the "throw some flat black paint, a little dirt and grease on it, and no one will know that's a supe perfect unobtainium part on my car".
And in regards to the plate, some of us are such bad drivers we need to run STL as well, so I could not seal it up for the weekend.
I'm all for MORE checks!
#13
Posted 02-06-2014 03:56 PM
Forgot about STL.... Good call.
I agree on the visual inspection for the computer but figured it was better than nothing. I do prefer and recommend sending off the winners computer after the weekend for all the reasons you state above.
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#14
Posted 02-06-2014 03:57 PM
So Jim, you're basically saying a tech inspection like what Sean suggested is out of the question?
#44 Team KBR/KKRProducts.com Spec Miata
#44 Team KBR/Dick Hannah Kia Rio B-Spec/ World Challenge TCB
#16 & #36 Blairco Spec Miata's, ICSCC
2014 SCCA B-Spec National Champion
Dick Hannah Dealerships | Kia Racing | Team-KBR.com | KKRProducts.com | DBB | Fast Specialties | Blairco Heating | SBOX Engineering | Sikk Shades by Eddie Bauer, JR | Hawk Performance
#15
Posted 02-06-2014 05:55 PM
So Jim, you're basically saying a tech inspection like what Sean suggested is out of the question?
Hi Kyle..... I don't think that's what he said. What I took from it was that we could ask for some basic tech to be completed at the Majors events, but that if we wanted to go deeper than some of what I outlined then we would need to setup a compliance fund and process to go deeper. I don't want to speak for Jim, but I think he is out with personal stuff for the next several days.
E-mail and forums are hard to decipher tone and intent, so please understand that Jim is an ambassador for the class and will do and fight for what is right. He is on our (SM) side.
Thanks... Sean
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#16
Posted 02-06-2014 06:38 PM
So Jim, you're basically saying a tech inspection like what Sean suggested is out of the question?
In airport... Look to be spending the night in Chicago unless 6-7-8-9 on stand by list make it.
Basically what sean said
Under a general majors tech, I would say all that sean outlined would be a stretch, but not impossible, but very unlikely. That being said manifolds and such have been pulled at majors. It all depends on chief of tech at that event. If you asking for my opinion, the level tech that sean wants( I want) is very Unlikely to occur less a compliance program. We could certainly push for it, Jim creighton reads our board and has heard our complaints. He had stepped up the tech at the races he does tech.
I love the idea of the compliance program, it guarantees meaningful tech and don't nind paying an extra 25-45 a weekend to do so.
Jim
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#17
Posted 02-06-2014 06:48 PM
Hey Jim,
I thought I understood that there is a Majors tech person from the national staff that is supposed to work with each region prior to the events on what to tech and maybe even how the event should be run. Am I mistaken on that? If there is 1 person who oversees this, can we get them involved and help them with some things to look for and possibly get them to agree to at least put in place some basic mandatory tech items like weight, plate and fuel? Hopefully a little more
Thanks... Sean
www.miatacage.com
360-606-7734
#18
Posted 02-06-2014 07:23 PM
East Street Auto Parts
Jim@Eaststreet.com
800 700 9080
#19
Posted 02-06-2014 08:10 PM
I wasn't attacking or anything, just simply trying to make sure how I read it was how I was understanding it. Appreciate the clarification!
I'm a Drago fan and appreciate the hard work Jim's done for Spec Miata racing as a whole. Just want that to be clear
#44 Team KBR/KKRProducts.com Spec Miata
#44 Team KBR/Dick Hannah Kia Rio B-Spec/ World Challenge TCB
#16 & #36 Blairco Spec Miata's, ICSCC
2014 SCCA B-Spec National Champion
Dick Hannah Dealerships | Kia Racing | Team-KBR.com | KKRProducts.com | DBB | Fast Specialties | Blairco Heating | SBOX Engineering | Sikk Shades by Eddie Bauer, JR | Hawk Performance
#20
Posted 02-06-2014 08:12 PM
I would be concerned however about charging an extra 25.00 to 45.00 for tech. Regions are working hard to keep the cost of the weekend at bay. But that is not easy, when tracks raise the cost of rental 2,000.00 or more per year in some cases. So the cost cannot be a deturant to an already expensive weekend for some.
- Bench Racer and DrDomm like this
Frank
TnT Racing
SCCA Ohio Valley Region
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users