Haven't updated the thread in a bit, but that doesn't mean I haven't been working on the car! I'll be back-posting progress for the next couple days.
I was planning to spend a lot of time adding stiffening braces (triangles) to my drivers side door bars. Before I did, I asked Erik Hardy to do some FEA analysis for me, as he does this sort of thing for work.
This isn't a 'full out' cage FEA analysis here. It's just a quick-and-dirty study of door bar performance for vertical stiffness. Certainly the boundary conditions aren't perfect, as the model consists solely of the door bars, front hoop, and one leg of the main hoop. Having other bars in the system would affect simulation results. That said, it's perfectly good information to use for making my decision of whether or not to add additional structure to the door bars.
4 designs were considered. The goal was to measure the vertical stiffness of each design. Loading was accomplished by grounding the front bottom of the front hoop, and applying a 1" vertical displacement to the rear bottom of the main hoop. Resulting stiffness was reported as a spring rate, in lbf/inch.
Yes, you can make a stiffer door bar setup by adding more tubes. But the takeaway here is that there is no need. 2688 lbf/in is very stiff already!! That's a full order of magnitude higher stiffness than, for example, the rear corner wheel rate. So, making the cage significantly stiffer would provide minimal/negligible benefit in chassis stiffness, relative to the suspension stiffness. It's just not worth the time, complexity, mass, and money to add more structure to my door bars. Thanks Erik!
Results:




