Sign In
Create Account
Which is precisely what I am advocating, had I made argument about parity sure it would have been understood by Mr engineer. Thank God lawyers know what is meant by there is a difference between agreeing on fault and agreeing the incident should be dropped, how many with wadded up cars at ginger would have advocated the issue be dropped I estimate zero.
In Kyle's post above I agree with him in a minor incident were there is fender contact if its minor, drivers agree on fault, SCCA should keep out of it, but when two three cars are going home on a flat bed, that takes this to a different level. There was serious risk of injury in those crashes. That would dictate points and probation IMO.
We are never going to take Judgment out of the equation. What we are trying to do is obtain better enforcement and some consistency. It will never be perfect, but it can be better.
I have a door donut and received a small door dent on my way to win the cat majors last year, was told by the guy I put the donut on he never had one before thought it was very cool all 3 of us were high giving after a great race... Eho I'd to say some tcc who may or may not have allegences or any real racing experience would have said the same thing.
At the end kf he day you can require reporting if contact... Still tough to enforce even when called in by corner workers. I have Ben called in a few times when I had never touched a soul, corner workers don't always get the number correct. But they try and that's all we can ask.
Does something need to change yes I think so. But there needs to an opportunity for drivers to resolve the conflict without big brother getting in on the party. If it's major contact sure call in the police or the swat. But minor stuff should be left to the drivers, we all talk so we know who is in the sheet metal bending business regularly and can choose to escalate the case up the chain if our minor bender was perpetrated by that individual.
Back to top
Report
