TROLL ALERT
Don't get sucked in Glen.
Clown, feel free to delete my post as I speak the truth and it might offend someone.
MPR I have no idea how I've offended you so badly. I think one of the things that makes a thread like this go down hill is what gets lost in translation trying to have a discussion over text only - the non verbal cues get lost and posts may come off as hostile / sarcastic /etc. I can only assume that is what has gone wrong between you and I.
The question to Glenn was 100% genuine because what I'd like to do is to consolidate the different viewpoints I've gotten here with Mike's comments directly to the blog and pass it all on to the Board.
I think I can summarize the views Mike and others here have posted this way:
- You could still only do the home races + 1 away race and win the championship, if competing for the championship is important to you. So the new rounds need not increase costs.
- You could decide not to worry about championship standings and race purely for the experience. There is no requirement to do every round or necessarily, to worry about championship standings.
- Half of NASA's regional races are at VIR, half at Summit Point, so that series involves travel too.
- It is debatable how much the Hoosiers slow down with heat cycles, and so it is debatable whether any cost premium is triggered by the Hoosier. The region looked carefully at both tires and have test data to show both were good tires.
- There are plenty of folks in the region who like the new tracks and the travel just as much as others may not; the region needs to serve all of their constituents.
Those are all perfectly valid points and I'll pass those on the Board as counterpoints, along with showing them Mike's comments to the post. If I missed any other counter points please feel free to let me know.